In July 2024, Australian influencer and OnlyFans creator Alicia Davis drew attention for a TikTok listing requirements for a prospective partner. Her checklist included expectations around participating in her OnlyFans content, as well as preferences about family, finances, physical traits and communication. Reports described mixed reactions, but the selected comments do not show how audiences broadly responded.
What Alicia Davis said in the TikTok
PerthNow identified Davis by the handle @littlebrunettebaddiee and reported that she introduced the list with: “If anyone wants to date me and they can’t check all these boxes then bye.” PerthNow’s July 2024 report said she wanted a partner willing to film different kinds of OnlyFans content. Davis described that participation as unpaid and said she would tell a partner when she needed them to take part.
The reported criteria also covered everyday relationship expectations. PerthNow said Davis preferred a partner who was taller than her, did not want to date someone with children, and wanted no more than three messages and one call a day. It also reported her preference that a partner not be prioritised over paying subscribers.
Other criteria reported by outlets
An AOL republication of a News.com.au report published July 11, 2024, listed further examples: owning a car, being fit, meeting stated height and penis-size preferences, having no history of cheating, being financially stable, wanting marriage without having been married before, paying one’s own airfares for travel, and having humour, self-development and communication skills. AOL’s republication presents these as reported details, not a verified transcript of every item on Davis’s original list.
Dagbladet’s Norwegian-language report, published July 13, 2024, reproduced the TikTok caption: “Non nogotiable dating checklist is a must in this day & age!! Do you have one?” The spelling and punctuation here follow the caption as reproduced by the outlet. Dagbladet also reported the unpaid content-participation expectation and limits on daily communication. Dagbladet’s report provides another account, but differences in coverage mean the full checklist should not be treated as established without the original post.
How people reportedly reacted
PerthNow and Dagbladet described a mix of critical and approving responses. PerthNow highlighted comments criticizing Davis’s expectations alongside a joking expression of interest; Dagbladet likewise reported both negative and positive comments. These are examples selected for news coverage, not a poll or a measure of overall public opinion.
Rank #2
What is known about the story’s timing
The reports document attention around the TikTok in July 2024. They do not establish whether the original post remains available, whether Davis later changed the checklist, or whether a new wave of attention followed by October 2026. The “viral” framing belongs to the contemporaneous coverage; the available reporting does not substantiate a current resurgence.
Quick Recap
Rank #3
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
