PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchAlmost the entire U.S. South was not literally placed behind an internet-wide Pornhub ban. The January 2025 headline described a wave of state age-verification laws and Aylo’s decision to block users in many of those states. By August 2026, the issue had expanded into a national patchwork involving 27 states with reported adult-website age-verification requirements, while the list of states with confirmed Pornhub shutdowns remained different.
The headline was broadly accurate when it appeared in January 2025, but it is now dated. Pornhub was not generally shut down by southern states or blocked at the internet-service-provider level. Instead, states passed laws requiring covered adult websites to verify that users are adults, and Pornhub’s owner, Aylo, responded in most affected states by blocking access from those jurisdictions rather than implementing the required verification systems.
By July 8, 2026, the Free Speech Coalition said that 27 states had enacted age-verification requirements aimed at adult websites. That list is broader than the original “almost the entire South” framing. It also does not prove that Pornhub blocks every listed state: a state can have an age-verification law without Pornhub’s access status being independently confirmed.
What “almost the entire U.S. South” meant
The phrase came from January 2025 reporting after Florida and South Carolina joined a group of states where Pornhub had already restricted access. At that point, reports counted 17 affected states and described the result as covering nearly the entire South. The original Ars Technica report is therefore best understood as a snapshot of the policy at that time—not a permanent count or a complete description of the situation in August 2026.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
#1 Best Overall
- DUAL-BAND WIFI 6 ROUTER: Wi-Fi 6(802.11ax) technology achieves faster speeds, greater capacity and reduced network congestion compared to the previous gen. All WiFi routers require a separate modem. Dual-Band WiFi routers do not support the 6 GHz band.
- AX1800: Enjoy smoother and more stable streaming, gaming, downloading with 1.8 Gbps total bandwidth (up to 1200 Mbps on 5 GHz and up to 574 Mbps on 2.4 GHz). Performance varies by conditions, distance to devices, and obstacles such as walls.
- CONNECT MORE DEVICES: Wi-Fi 6 technology communicates more data to more devices simultaneously using revolutionary OFDMA technology
- EXTENSIVE COVERAGE: Achieve the strong, reliable WiFi coverage with Archer AX1800 as it focuses signal strength to your devices far away using Beamforming technology, 4 high-gain antennas and an advanced front-end module (FEM) chipset
- OUR CYBERSECURITY COMMITMENT: TP-Link is a signatory of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Secure-by-Design pledge. This device is designed, built, and maintained, with advanced security as a core requirement.
The restrictions subsequently spread beyond the South. The most precise current description is that Pornhub’s access restrictions began in the South and developed into a nationwide patchwork covering many states, including most of the South.
| Question | Best-supported answer |
|---|---|
| Did states directly ban Pornhub? | Generally, no. The laws target age verification by covered adult websites. Aylo made the decision to geoblock users in many states rather than comply through a verification system. |
| Was this an ISP-level shutdown? | Generally, no. The restriction described in the research is a website-level geographic block, not an order requiring every internet provider to disable Pornhub. |
| Does every state with an age-verification law block Pornhub? | Not necessarily. The list of states with laws and the list of states with confirmed Pornhub shutdown dates are not identical. |
| Is the South still the whole story? | No. The policy has expanded into several regions of the country, although southern states remain heavily represented. |
Where Pornhub restrictions were documented
A June 2026 University of Chicago working paper identifies Pornhub shutdown dates in the following states:
- Alabama
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- Florida
- Georgia
- Idaho
- Indiana
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Oklahoma
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Virginia
- Wyoming
The paper separately reports no Pornhub shutdown date for Louisiana because Pornhub used a third-party age-verification provider there. It also reports no shutdown date for Ohio because Aylo argued that Ohio’s law did not require it to comply. Those exceptions are important: they show why a simple map of states that passed laws cannot be treated as a definitive map of Pornhub blocks.
The working paper is evidence of shutdown dates in its study period, not a live access-status database. A user’s actual result can also depend on location detection, network configuration, changes in company policy, and later litigation or legislation.
The 27-state age-verification landscape
The Free Speech Coalition’s July 8, 2026 FAQ lists these states as having age-verification laws currently in effect for adult websites:
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Montana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
That is a count of states with applicable laws—not a claim that Pornhub blocks all 27. The list also illustrates why date and source matter. The Age Verification Providers Association’s state-by-state review describes a sequence of measures beginning with Louisiana’s HB 142, which took effect on January 1, 2023, followed by laws in states including Utah, Mississippi, Virginia, Arkansas, Texas, Montana, North Carolina, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Nebraska, Indiana, Alabama, Oklahoma, Florida, Tennessee, South Carolina, Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota, Georgia, Arizona, Ohio, and Missouri.
The two summaries are not perfectly identical in timing or classification. For example, the providers association described Iowa, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey proposals that were not necessarily enacted at the time of its review, while the Free Speech Coalition’s later list includes Iowa among laws currently in effect. North Dakota also had a device- and operating-system-related measure listed as scheduled to take effect on August 1, 2026. These differences do not invalidate either source, but they mean that a state’s current legal status should be checked against the relevant state authority rather than inferred from a national map.
How the laws work
These laws do not all use identical definitions or compliance rules. Many apply when a commercial website contains at least a specified proportion of material considered harmful to minors. The common threshold is one-third of the site’s content, but there are notable exceptions:
| Feature | How the research describes it |
|---|---|
| Typical content threshold | At least one-third of a commercial website’s content is commonly used as the trigger. |
| Kansas | Uses a 25-percent webpage threshold in the coalition’s summary. |
| Missouri, South Dakota, and Wyoming | Do not set a minimum percentage in that summary. |
| Entity scope | Indiana, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Missouri apply their laws to all sites rather than only commercial entities, according to the Free Speech Coalition’s description. |
Once a site is covered, the verification options can also vary. The coalition lists methods such as:
- Government-issued identification;
- State-approved digital identification;
- Commercial identity or age databases;
- Transactional information, potentially including mortgage or employment records;
- Facial age estimation or liveness checks; and
- Other methods considered commercially reasonable under a particular law.
The policy disagreement is partly about effectiveness and partly about data architecture. A conventional system may require a website or outside vendor to process information that links a person’s identity or age to their use of adult content. Critics argue that this creates an attractive target for breaches, misuse, or compelled disclosure. Supporters argue that websites should not allow minors to access material covered by the laws and that commercially reasonable verification can achieve that goal.
Why Aylo chose blocking in most states
Aylo has said that requiring adult websites to collect identity information creates privacy and security risks. Its stated position is that refusing access throughout a jurisdiction can be safer than building a system that associates sensitive identity or age information with adult-content use.
Rank #2
- DEFENSE-IN-DEPTH SECURITY Built with Franklin’s advanced three-layer security architecture designed to help protect families, seniors, kids, and connected devices with enterprise-grade network protection made simple.
- ENTERPRISE-GRADE SMARTWEB FILTER PROTECTION Automatically helps block millions of harmful websites including malware, phishing, gambling, and adult content directly at the network level with simple ON/OFF control through the SEIONA app.
- ROUTER-LEVEL NETWORK SECURITY Every connected device including Smart TVs, gaming consoles, phones, tablets, and laptops passes through centralized low-latency content filtering designed for safer browsing and high-performance connectivity.battery.
- PROTECTION AT HOME AND ON THE GO SEIONA mobile controls help parents manage screen time, app blocking, schedules, and geo-fence alerts across supported mobile devices regardless of how the device connects to the internet.
- FAST WI-FI 6 CONNECTIVITY Reliable dual-band Wi-Fi 6 performance for streaming, gaming, video calls, remote work, and smart home devices with simple setup and mesh-ready expansion.
Aylo has also promoted a different technical model: device-based age assurance. In that model, a device or operating system supplies an age signal to a service without necessarily requiring the adult website itself to receive a government identity document. In May 2026, Aylo said it was restoring access for eligible users on iOS in the United Kingdom who had confirmed their age through Apple’s device-level UK age-verification process. That UK example demonstrates the type of system Aylo prefers; it does not establish that the same process is available in every U.S. state.
These are Aylo’s policy and advocacy arguments, not an independent finding that every age-verification law is ineffective or unsafe. The laws differ in their privacy safeguards, verification methods, scope, and enforcement mechanisms, so they cannot be evaluated as one uniform system.
What the Supreme Court decided
The legal baseline changed on June 27, 2025, when the Supreme Court decided Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton. The Court held that Texas could require covered commercial websites to verify users’ ages before providing access to sexually explicit material. Texas House Bill 1181 allowed government-ID verification or commercially reasonable transactional-data methods.
The Court recognized that age verification imposes an incidental burden on adults who want to access lawful material, but held that the Texas law was a constitutionally permissible exercise of the state’s authority to protect minors. The decision reversed a lower-court outcome that had temporarily blocked enforcement.
The ruling did not automatically approve every age-verification statute in the country. A later challenge can turn on a law’s wording, the category of websites it covers, its privacy rules, the verification methods it permits, the way it is enforced, and the specific constitutional claims being litigated.
Texas’s enforcement provisions help explain why a website might consider compliance costly or risky. As described by the Supreme Court, the Texas attorney general can seek an injunction and civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day, with an additional potential penalty if minors access covered material because of noncompliance. Other states use different combinations of attorney-general enforcement, private lawsuits, civil fines, and criminal penalties.
Did the blocks reduce adult-site use?
Blocking one major site did not eliminate access to adult websites. A June 2026 University of Chicago working paper used individual-level Comscore data to study adults’ behavior after restrictions took effect. Its estimates point to a combination of reduced use, movement to competing sites, and circumvention.
For every 100 hours previously spent on leading adult websites, the researchers estimated that approximately:
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors- 50 hours remained at noncompliant sites;
- 30 hours continued through VPN-based circumvention;
- 10 hours shifted from compliant to noncompliant sites; and
- 10 hours disappeared from adult-site use altogether.
The paper also estimated an approximately 8-percent long-term reduction in total adult-website consumption in treated states. Its broader estimate of roughly a 10-percent reduction and the 8-percent long-term figure are related but not identical measures; they should not be presented as two interchangeable exact results.
The study found that Pornhub use fell sharply after shutdowns while time spent on major noncompliant competitors increased. That supports a more complicated conclusion than either “the restrictions worked completely” or “nothing changed.” Restrictions appear to reduce some adult-site use, but they also produce substitution toward other platforms and circumvention around the block.
Important limits on the research
The University of Chicago analysis has several limitations that matter when interpreting claims about safety or minors:
- The panel consisted of adults, so its estimates describe adult behavior rather than minors’ behavior.
- Comscore does not observe every form of private browsing, meaning some activity may be missed.
- Some measured residual Pornhub activity could reflect visits to shutdown or explanatory landing pages rather than ordinary content consumption.
- The study is a working paper, so its estimates should be treated as research evidence rather than a final government evaluation.
Accordingly, the research supports saying that the restrictions changed where adults spent time and modestly reduced measured adult-site use. It does not support a definitive claim that the laws made minors safer, prevented minors from accessing adult content, or eliminated adult access.
Rank #3
- High speed router with integrated VPN tunnel support for secure remote network access
- (8) Gigabit LAN Ports plus (1) Gigabit WAN Port; 20,000 Concurrent Sessions
- Policy based service management allows for easy configuration of firewall rules
- Supports (5) SSL VPN tunnels and (10) Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) tunnels
- Simultaneously supports up to (25) IPsec VPN tunnels plus (25) additional PPTP/L2TP tunnels
Aylo separately argues that traffic can move toward less moderated or less regulated services. That is a company position, although it points in the same general direction as the study’s finding that use increased on noncompliant competing platforms.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What users should know about circumvention
The study documents VPN-based circumvention, but that finding is not a recommendation or a guide to bypassing a state restriction. VPN use is not necessarily lawful everywhere, safe, or anonymous, and the research does not establish the legal status of any particular method in any particular jurisdiction. It also does not show that a VPN prevents websites, providers, or other parties from collecting information.
The central practical point is that a website-level block can change the route people use to reach online services without removing the underlying material from the internet. That is why the observed effects include both reduced consumption and migration to other platforms.
Aylo’s 2026 repeal campaign
In late July and early August 2026, Aylo began an organized campaign to repeal or reform the state laws. Axios reported that the company sent a letter to more than 300 politicians in 28 states. The letter argued that age-verification laws had not prevented minors from accessing adult content and had exposed adults to unnecessary data risks.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Follow-up local reporting described Aylo seeking a return to browsers in Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, Indiana, North Carolina, and Florida. Those reports describe the company’s advocacy position—not completed repeals, court victories, or confirmed restorations of access. As of August 12, 2026, there is no basis in the supplied research for saying that those states had repealed their laws or that Pornhub had already returned throughout them.
The clearest way to understand the controversy
The dispute has three separate questions that are often collapsed into one headline:
- Can a state require age verification? The Supreme Court upheld Texas’s law under the specific challenge before it, while leaving room for challenges to other statutes.
- Does age verification protect privacy? That depends on the method, who receives the data, how long it is retained, and what legal safeguards apply. Government-ID uploads, commercial databases, facial checks, transactional records, and device-based age signals present different risks.
- Does blocking one site prevent access? The available adult-behavior research says no. It found a reduction in total use, but also substantial movement to competing sites and VPN-based circumvention.
So the original headline captured a real regional wave of Pornhub restrictions, but it simplified both the mechanism and the geography. States generally imposed age-verification obligations on covered websites; Aylo responded with geoblocking in many jurisdictions; the policy later spread beyond the South; and the resulting behavior was substitution and partial reduction, not a complete shutdown of adult-site access.
Sources and research notes
- Ars Technica’s January 2025 report for the original “almost the entire South” framing.
- Free Speech Coalition age-verification FAQ, updated July 8, 2026, for the 27-state list and summaries of thresholds and verification methods.
- University of Chicago working paper for shutdown dates, Comscore-based behavior estimates, and study limitations.
- Age Verification Providers Association state-by-state summary for the legislative timeline and later 2026 measures.
- The Supreme Court’s opinion in Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton for the Texas ruling and enforcement details.
- Aylo’s May 2026 statement for the company’s position on privacy, device-based age assurance, and the UK iOS example.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did states directly ban Pornhub?
No. Most states did not order internet providers to shut down Pornhub. They passed laws requiring covered adult websites to verify users’ ages, and Aylo chose to geoblock users in many affected states rather than implement the required verification process.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Does every state with an age-verification law block Pornhub?
Not necessarily. The Free Speech Coalition listed 27 states with age-verification laws in effect as of July 8, 2026, while the University of Chicago working paper identified shutdown dates in a different set of states. Louisiana and Ohio were specifically reported as exceptions in the paper: Pornhub used a third-party verifier in Louisiana and argued that Ohio’s law did not require compliance.
What did the Supreme Court rule about Pornhub age verification?
The Supreme Court upheld Texas House Bill 1181 in Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton on June 27, 2025. It did not automatically approve every age-verification law; other statutes can differ in scope, privacy safeguards, enforcement, and litigation status.
Did the restrictions eliminate access to adult websites?
The University of Chicago working paper found reduced total adult-site use among the adults in its panel, but also substantial substitution to noncompliant competitors and VPN-based circumvention. It did not measure minors’ behavior and does not establish that VPN use is legal, safe, or anonymous.
The Bottom Line
The January 2025 claim was a dated description of a real wave of Pornhub geoblocks, not a literal ban imposed by almost every southern state. By August 2026, age-verification laws covered a broader national patchwork—27 states according to the Free Speech Coalition—but state laws, confirmed Pornhub blocks, and actual user behavior remained three different things. The available research points to modestly lower adult-site use alongside substantial movement to competing sites and circumvention.
Recommended Free Tools
