Email Updates - Get notified each week via email of the best new documentaries      Sign Me Up!
Processing your request, Please wait....

Similar Documentaries to Thunderbolts of the Gods:

Adventures In Human Evolution
This historical series on the evolution of man answers fundamental questions. Who were our ancestors...
Mars, Dead or Alive
The great PBS science series Nova scores another hit with Mars: Dead or Alive, capturing all the exc...
The Universe: Beyond The Big Bang
A documentary that explores how humanity came to understand the universe and its origins in the Big ...

Enjoy this Documentary? Express your views below!!

Thunderbolts of the Gods

Science|18 Jun, 2012|63 Comments |
Click Stars Below to Vote!
0saves
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 2.2/5 (11 votes cast)

This film is an introduction to key issues of the ray theory and includes interviews with some of the leading figures in Electric Universe research.

Thunderbolts is designed to prepare the audience for the work of David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill is now presented in a series of monographs that rays of the gods is the first, the second electric universe. The film also includes contributions from other group members’ PROJECT Thunders.

Promises the viewer rays in 64 minutes, a clear understanding of the key elements of the theory being explored by Talbott, Thornhill and their associates. 

Thunderbolts of the Gods, 2.2 out of 5 based on 11 ratings
Subscribe via RSSPlease subscribe to our RSS feed to have new doc's delivered straight to your reader.
This Video is Tagged With:

, ,

URL:

63 Comments

  1. That video was great!!! Finally we have new theories that are making sense of our universe, and explaining many of the problems that current theories have not been able too. You must look into to the electric universe website!!!!

  2. phliperphil says:

    if you look at every single reality on earth..(structures) electricity .. gases water conduitation …lightning all of it electricity all duplicated on earth as it is in the heavens . ….teslha knew all of this . and that is why he was shut down .. there was no money for the elites in free energy ….. simple insn’t it

  3. Every spherical region infinite Universe forms wave-center’s or Spherical Standing Wave Front Structure’s (See electron riding on a light wave youtube) “Inward spherical wave’s are multiplying time, when a man mutliplies energy, forming+/-breaking graviational potential or expansion by casting a stone in water his senses see only wave-ripples. They do not tell him those ripples are locational rings series expanding spheres dissipating gravity same ratio as being mutliplied by the falling stone.”

  4. There two masses involved: One is +/-m and other is equivalent mass +Mu, of Hubble universe, or radius R=c/H. Vector mass field M acting on accelerated mass m is, M=amG/c2r. Inward spherical wave front’s compressing oscillating +/mass/- de-compressing gravitational systems are ash’s to prior electrical system’s. The energy of gravitation of a Standing-wave structure of mass +/-m, acted upon by the rest of the mass +Mu of the universe, from a distance r, is Graviational energy =Eg= +/-m +Mu G/r

  5. so basically in an electrical model, if you take a comet out of it’s extreme elliptical orbit and place it into a circular orbit around the sun, the comets tail should disappear because the comet is no longer crossing an electrical potential gradient

  6. Javierm0n0 says:

    i always wondered why the universe and the neurons in the brain looked similar, it’s because they have similar events occurring. Electrical impulses darting back and forth need similar road work from macro to micro in order to be efficient.

  7. “Also, weren’t there several reports of modules being hit by “lightning”? Hmm,” i havent heard of modules being hit by lightningI would guess that the modules would act like comets themselves in that they are changing orbits from one planet to another. do you have a link for the modules getting hit by lightning?

  8. 6of6 says:

    Re: electrical discharge/space crafts. As I understood it, the polarity differences are caused or due to the extreme elipictical orbits. Also, weren’t there several reports of modules being hit by “lightning”? Hmm, perhaps those “orbs” that follow or appear to be attracted to them are a form of plasma attracted to the conductivity or polarity you mentioned.

  9. MrHelios77 says:

    I think is a very exciting module to start incorporating. Im not too fond of the connection to mythology or earth history, those are things I think will take a great deal longer to understand. But imagine the possibilities, if the entire universe is electric how far are we from free 0 point energy. Unlimited travel to the deepest parts of space, unlimited infrastructural capabilities, field technology, energy healing, energy communication. I think it’s a very good step in the right direction

  10. iansuderman says:

    I have to agree the music is to loud.They could be right. If gravity is the displacement of space time, then the effect of stretching this material would have a limit. Mass may increase the stretch but in theory even the fabric of space should have a maximum stretch beyond which no greater effect will be felt. Black holes would have a limit.If though the force we observe is consistently caused by electricity what is conducting it and where is the source?

  11. Thangalin says:

    “The problem is in nuclear chemistry, we know that you cannot pack neutrons together.”Nuclear forces cannot pack nucleons together. However, neutron stars are packed by intense gravity. Gravity is an additive force: the more matter you have, the stronger the gravitational pulls.The intense gravitational tug of these massive stars easily conquers whatever nuclear forces are present.

  12. jaykulls says:

    @Typho0n86 Leaving comments like this only make you look like a busy body. He was the one declaring me as a tough guy for expressing my opinion. You’ll find the more stupid and unfounded a theory is, the worse the reaction to it will be.

  13. jaykulls says:

    @OperationIntrudeN313 The pictures were far from identical. I bet I could name a thousand round objects in nature. It’s pretty common for and artist to draw a circle purely out of his imagination. I bet if you asked a three year old to scribble on a page, he would draw a circle with a pattern in it. It’s fare to come up with a theory, but don’t get your knickers in a not if it’s a stupid one and people don’t believe it. If people came up with it thousands of years ago it probably isnt true.

  14. @jaykulls If you want to believe that humans just happened to invent hundreds of identical archetypal forms from thin air, be my guest. That takes about the same degree of faith as swallowing the laundry list of mathematical absurdities dictated by current cosmology. Have fun choking on your Gnostic prudery, anonymous internet tough guy.

  15. @jaykulls Not crap at all. The theory has been around for more than a hundred years and is thankfully gaining some momentum after far too long being unjustly ignored. And it goes far beyond being round; it’s a very specific, repeatable discharge structure inherent to high density plasma that was reproduced independently by cultures all over the globe. But hey, abstract mathematics and non-existent dark energy is a much better explanation, right? Right.

  16. jaykulls says:

    @OperationIntrudeN313 Lol, yeah, plasma balls are the only round things in existence. The fact that round artwork exists in all cultures proves whatever you want it to right? If people can believe this crap, it really shows how poorly educated people are.

  17. truetotunes says:

    @Typho0n86 If you don’t know where I’m ‘coming from’ maybe thinking outside the box could serve you better. I don’t know it all in any way,nor does anyone else. If they or ‘you’ did we would not be discussing anything. I understand solar power comes from the sun! I’m merely pointing out that there may be energies from the stars or(dark matter) that even the most ardent scientists have no clue. Only human arrogance could suggest we know all that is.By the way I didn’t expect an answer.

  18. truetotunes says:

    @Typho0n86 The theory imho that there is a force far greater than gravity is a plausible realtiy, as it were. I may be wrong but isn’t NASA building or have they already created a craft that will be using an energy that they believe exists in the rays of the sun, or is it the 0 point energy field they are trying to harness. I’ve heard nothing from mainstream media. Or any other. Maybe I don’t know where to look.

  19. romansXIII says:

    You haven’t argued sufficiently against any of the points raised in these videos. You want to talk science (discovery?) but you approach from a position of ‘all knowing’ when you are clearly ignorant. Also you have a clear emotional attachment to the status quo. Let it go, it doesn’t serve you!Go ahead and pick a point raised in this video, and see if you can argue against it lucidly without name calling and ridiculing… on your marks, get set, go!

  20. truetotunes says:

    I would wager your words(“this is not real science people”) were uttered by others when the theory the earth was actually round was presented for the first time. Quantum theory is still looked at with plenty of scepticism from staunch scientists. IMHO this type of video at least gives us a new point to ponder.I am not a scientist but I am constantly enthralled by new theories of the cosmos.Can’t say this is true but it sure is neat to think about.

Leave a Comment