Video Not Working?
Processing your request, Please wait....The Great Global Warming Swindle
In this controversial film, we see an argument against the majority scientific consensus that global warming is man made. This film sparked outrage in the scientific community as well as those who were interviewed who felt that they were “swindled” into saying what the producer wanted. Check out what the controversy is all about!
Please bookmark or share this documentary using the social buttons on the right to help increase awareness of important issues raised in each documentary. It only takes 1 second/click and is gratefully received!
Think you could write a better description for this documentary?
Fancy earning a few bucks in the process?
If the answer is YES! then we could be in business! Read on for more information...
How does it work?
We understand there are more knowledgeable and passionate people out there watching our documentaries, we also know many of our documentary descriptions could be, well, more descriptive! So, we're calling for your help and want you to join our team!
OK, so how exactly does it work?
Simple... you submit your documentary description/review to us, if we like it and host it in this designated section, we'll split our revenue (generated from advertisements on this page) with you, 50/50, straight down the middle! Paid monthly via PayPal, with no minimum payout!
How much can I earn?
Well it does vary, some of our more popular documentaries earn upwards of $4/day (at the moment...) and are increasing daily. The more traffic we get to our site (or the page where your description is located) the more you can earn! If your work is selected to show on our site, why not promote it? Send traffic to your documentary page and you'll earn more!
How Can I Be Sure I get Paid What I Earn?
We send out proof of your earnings through a Google Adsense Report on pay day! We're not in the market to rip off our visitors. If you're happy, we're happy. And, if you ever want to know how much your earnings are during a month, simply email us and we'll let you know!
The not so SMALL print...
There are obviously some small clauses (as with everything in today's world!). All we ask of you is that all content submitted is unique, in good taste, none-offensive, well written and over 300 words (the more the better!). The higher quality your work, the more likely we are to put it on our site, and the more likely it is to stay there earning you money every day!
So What Are You Waiting For? Send us your documentary review now and we'll let you know if we're happy for it to go up!
Please feel free to subscribe to our RSS feed to have future documentaries delivered straight to your feed reader.Related Videos:
Zeitgeist The Movie – Documentary And ReviewEndGame Documentary – Blueprint For Global Enslavement
India Rediscovered
Young, Black & Republican
I’m the toothfairy and men think that I am not real. That is the epitome of human ignorance.
This is not my real name or people would stop putting teeth under their pillows which I so despretely depend on.
… or I could be full of shit
American retards and idiots, global warming exists and is human-caused. There is NO legitimate debate. There is NO controversy. There is only the wishful thinking of retarded, selfish Americans who want to continue consuming, guzzling oil and playing with their toys.
All rational people know this – which is of course why Americans don’t.
Thanks, Sean!
I’m a scientist. There isn’t a single thing that man can do to alter climate. That way of thinking is the epitome of man’s arrogance.
This, of course, is not my real name. I would be fired. Too many of us depend on funding to say what we really think.
Everyone seems to dance around the central issue. There is no conclusive evidence for or against human contribution to the global climate. Since we do not fully understand how our atmosphere works to produce climate, it is impossible to determine human influence. Just as, in a previous example, it is not a valid argument to say that smoking causes cancer. If that were true, everyone who ever smoked will get cancer. That is obviously not true. It can be a contributing factor and should be treated as such.
Having said that, it is also not wise to dump substances into our environment when we don’t know the overall effect that they will have. There simply isn’t enough information to properly determine how much our climate is changing. For all we know, there could be a sudden dip in overall global temperatures next week. How many different theories of climatic input have you seen? I have seen quite a few and a lot of them are in conflict with each other. We simply don’t know how it all works.
Are we really going back to those 30,000 scientist thing again? Weren’t most of those scientists not even in the same field as those who study climate?
I also love the follow-the-money argument. God forbid scientists make money. Why is it alright for oil and coal companies to make money and not scientists? I have followed the money, as you suggest, and it leads straight to corporations seeking profits over everything else, including the security and safety of the US and every other country out there. If you continue to follow the money you also see that we send over a billion dollars overseas – everyday. As a veteran who hauled jet fuel all over Iraq I faced combat everyday. Where do you think Middle Eastern countries get most of their funds?
Follow the money, indeed. Wake up.
Why not try looking at solar waves and sunspots? If something gets hot dont you generally look at the source of the heat first?
Actually over 30’000 scientists from all over the globe have signed a petition to squash the idea that global warming is man made. Links below
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/…/Scientists-sign-petition-denying-man-made-global-warming.html
and
http://www.petitionproject.org/
Global warming is happening but nowhere near the rates the UN were claiming it was going to get to (4-5 degrees) Infact Lord Christopher Monckton senior advisor to Margaret Thatcher speaks about the paper which proves this in his speech, its totally correct go find it for yourselfs. Basically if we burned all our remaining fossil fuels we would get an increase in temperature from 0.5 to 0.7 degrees celsius. Its all in black and white go read it. Link to Lord Monckton below, its long but worth watching if you want to know your onions about “global warming” Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stij8sUybx0
why not trying to look at solar winds and sunspots, if somethings getting hotter dont you generally look at the heatsource first?
google it!
The religion is flawed. There is no ‘majority consensus’ about the cause of global warming if it does exist in the long term. Wanna know the truth? Follow the money! How else ais a flock of meteorologists going to get a paycheck if they don’t try to create a sense of doom and forboding. The cathedrals of pop science are crumbling so the believers are feaking. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Think of how so many of us mock those ignorant folks from centuries past for their poor scientific understanding, glad I won’t be around when future generations judge us. P.S. It’s DENIAL not denile. The deniers are those that persist in believing a debunked tenant of your social religion. God save us from ALL fanatics, yet pity them for they are blind.
Hey, i found many of the information seekers and givers here, that’s why trying to locate the facts….
Are we all Dying soon?
I have been threatened by the author of this blog about the complete destruction of earth and end of human race on earth…Do you think whatever he is saying is going to happen? Please take your valued time and explain your expert lookout to reassure me.
http://rush2me.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/global-warming-a-doomsday-in-near-future
Well said, Joe. Ignore the science at your peril. Where is the true scientific evidence to refute Global Warming? There isn’t any. The overwhelming scientific evidence supports man-made global warming.
Well said Don
if global warming is really caused by CO2 then the cure is to let the trees take it in or to launch a few hundred nukes at america (who guzzle most of the oil and food in the world) and that would give the rest of us a chance, a chance to recolonize america and a chance to live the fallout dream
Au contraire. You are the denier. Why can’t the left allow scientists speak on behalf of the other side? There are hundreds of them, and they aint Flat Earthers. Since weathermen can hardly predict next week’s weather, what makes all you global warming hysterians think that mankind can predict the Earth’s weather a hundred years in advance, or even 20? Just imagine if we’re about to enter the next Ice Age. Global Warming might save out butt. You guys are so rigid in your thinking. Some species might thrive with global warming, including man. Some cities will revive. Still, it hasn’t been proven that global warming is manmade, not by a longshot. Read ALL the evidence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Criticism_from_two_scientists_featured_in_the_programme
Criticism from two scientists featured in the programme
Carl Wunsch, professor of Physical Oceanography at MIT, is featured in the Channel 4 version of the programme. Afterwards he said that he was “completely misrepresented” in the film and had been “totally misled” when he agreed to be interviewed.[7][32] He called the film “grossly distorted” and “as close to pure propaganda as anything since World War Two.”[33], and he lodged a complaint with Ofcom. He particularly objected to how his interview material was used:
“Eigil Friis-Christensen
Eigil Friis-Christensen’s research was used to support claims about the influence of solar activity on climate, both in the programme and Durkin’s subsequent defence of it. Friis-Christensen, with environmental Research Fellow Nathan Rive, criticised the way the solar data were used:
“We have concerns regarding the use of a graph featured in the documentary titled ‘Temp & Solar Activity 400 Years’. Firstly, we have reason to believe that parts of the graph were made up of fabricated data that were presented as genuine. The inclusion of the artificial data is both misleading and pointless. Secondly, although the narrator commentary during the presentation of the graph is consistent with the conclusions of the paper from which the figure originates, it incorrectly rules out a contribution by anthropogenic greenhouse gases to 20th century global warming.[8]”
http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2009/04/global_warming_deniers_took_a.html
The Global Warming deniers are the same as the people a few decades ago who said there was not enough scientific evidence too show that tobacco causes cancer.
The documentary is right on target. The description provided by Documentary Tube, however, is typical “Church of Global Warming” rhetoric. Let the documentary speak for itself. The scientists in the documentary knew exactly what they were saying and made well thought out and supported arguments. A person can’t even view the program and make their own conclusions. The description written by Global Warming Apologists strives to invalidate the program even before the viewer sees it. Typical liberal propaganda.