Email Updates - Get notified each week via email of the best new documentaries      Sign Me Up!
Processing your request, Please wait....

Enjoy this Documentary? Express your views below!!

Mysterious Origins of Man

Nature|17 Oct, 2012|18 Comments |
Click Stars Below to Vote!
0saves
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 2.2/5 (7 votes cast)

This documentary presents the ancient artifacts that contradict the official historical perspective that humanity has advanced scientifically since the beginning of human history.

It is not necessarily a deliberate conspiracy in the sense that some people meet in a smoky room and saying “we’re going to fool people.” It happens automatically within the scientific community.

So when a particular test, you do not agree with the prevailing theory, automatically people do not want to talk about it, do not report, which means that science can not progress in the way one would expect.

Although much of the evidence in this presentation has been much debated and contested, there is some evidence that it is very difficult to refute. The main objective of this paper is that the official view of human history is very questionable, particularly the progression of knowledge in the sciences, mathematics, and spirituality

Mysterious Origins of Man, 2.2 out of 5 based on 7 ratings
Subscribe via RSSPlease subscribe to our RSS feed to have new doc's delivered straight to your reader.
This Video is Tagged With:

, , , ,

URL:

18 Comments

  1. I have to convey my appreciation for your generosity for men and women who must have help with your area. Your very own commitment to passing the solution all-around ended up being pretty significant and have surely made professionals like me to get to their desired goals. Your entire useful key points implies this much to me and still more to my office workers. Thank you; from all of us.

  2. Normally I do not read article on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do so! Your writing style has been amazed me. Thanks, quite nice post.

  3. katalog www says:

    You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be actually something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and very broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  4. DaithiDublin says:

    I’ve done my research, thanks. But I’m always ready to do some more. Do you have any additional material that might prove any of the claims in this video? Because there is none presented in it, or attributed to any of the contributors. What we have here are authors, journalists, medical doctors, a fundamentalist preacher posing as an archaeologist and failed scientists making unsubstantiated claims. If you try to be scientific, you must adhere to the scientific method. That’s absent here.

  5. The majority of video supporting evolution are made by Atheist so what’s your point. At least the producers of this video kept an open minded approach to the origin of man. The mystery of the site of Hueyatlaco in Mexico was never solved. You should do your research before you open your mouth.

  6. DaithiDublin says:

    In fact *all* of these claims have been refuted and debunked countless times. When you talk of a ‘dogmatic lie’, it should concern you that so many of the people involved in this production are creationists, both Christian and Hindu, and lack the qualifications to make any assessments whatsoever. Or that the documentary itself was the product of the Bhaktivedanta Institute, a branch of Krishna Conciousness. Cremo & Thompson, the key sources, are both members.

  7. VexT916 says:

    One of the best alternative documentary research ever exposing the fact that the orthodox science community and history is mostly a big dogmatic lie contrive to dumb down us peasants and serfs from knowing or understanding the “real” past. I doubt any critics, cynics, and skeptics have ever made a good rational claim against any of these findings yet.

  8. Better check this video before you think you know something ! Links: watch?v=R9veMGPsfiQ and second link: watch?v=OmQyJLUhDZc ,”Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves” – this said our Saviour Jesus Christ in hebrew: Yeshua Ha’Mashiach, in greek: Ἰησοῦς Χριστός-Iesous Christos- Matthew 7:15, King James Bible

  9. PreciseBible says:

    I enjoyed all the comments. Let me say,the info is accurate, if anyone will take time to research it. Anything less is speculation. I spent a week digging in GlennRose, foundthe footprints under limestone slabs, met the people digging them up, found them honest.Baugh is Christian, met him. I Read Cremos book, he is Buddhist. I read Hancock’s books, he is not religious. There are definitely some anommalous findings that are beginning to crack conventional wisdom. Anyone can speculate or cri

  10. AngeliqueEU says:

    200.000 years ago sounds more logic to me than only 20.000 years ago … How many Generations does it take to go from an ape-like man-species to what we are now?More than 20.000 years I would guess … more than 50.000 years … so the 200.000 sounds logic to me. next to that we know today that Apes like Chimpanzee also use tools! So why won’t we be able of that 200.000 years ago?

  11. MrEman561 says:

    Evolution claims that we developed from animals to primitive man, but the evidence from real archaeology points to just the opposite (similarity between fossils proves nothing except that they were similar, nothing more). We have not been getting smarter, but getting dumber Creation is “subject to decay”.

    • Anonymous says:

      if anything we are evolving at faster rates in our current physiological form with faster gains in our intelligence. just look around at the worlds technology now to how it was 100 years ago, or the Olympic records that have been broken at each games, the average height,of a population or even what primary school/grade school kids learn in maths/science etc to what was taught at that age even 20 years ago.. im not saying that maybe 100,00 or 200,000 years ago we weren’t further on evolutionary speaking or had less knowledge than at present but your comment seems unfounded and a little irrational considering a more modern timescale i.e. 0 AD- 2012 AD.

  12. awakeFemale says:

    Various sites around the world demonstrate, the technologies used by the ancients remain unknown and also greatly understated by orthodox academics. It appears, the most modern of engineering capabilities are nothing new — not the most evolved we have been.

  13. marksp says:

    To sum up: The entire scientific community along the years has been covering up the truth on one of the biggest conspiracy theories ever existed. And of course the planet of the apes man (and your presenter) has all figured out.

  14. tatsuya2112 says:

    @CookedBeefChops You do not need to believe that the world is 6000 years old to believe in god, the 6000 year timeline isn’t biblical anyway, it comes from the 1800′s.I believe the world is much older than 6000 years old, but i also believe in god.

  15. pendu87 says:

    Okay, evidence suggest that homo sapiens existed at the same time with possibly the homo habilis. However, no evidence suggest that the Homo habilis fossils are found on the top most strata of soils. Hence the question of their coexistence in the same time period, and the suggestion that evolution theory is invalid, is quite wrong. If only one species fossils are found in the strata of the other, then the others fossils should also be present in the first’s strata.

  16. cadman2300 says:

    @DukeNukemIsHere3 Indeed it is and it got panned pretty harshly by real scientists. The Paluxy river footprints in particular have been proven to be fakes since the 1980s and this pseudo-documentary came out in 1996.As a subsidiary of General Electric, NBC could do another fake documentary that says the earth is flat as long as there’s money to be made off of such nonsense.

  17. balotelli456 says:

    @TheTime4solutions its not a propaganda foisted upon a population, it was not a all around issue that was rare. its deep inside white culture and the first disease americans face in everyday life, its not only an issue but a matter that seperates many races and when its called the uUN ITED STATES, and its still deep rooted inside the grains of what makes us a society of anger and separation in america

Leave a Comment